Comparative study on the printing of the same polymer, here Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene, called ABS, with different 3D printers (filaments and granules) Are the printed parts comparable to each other? Does the colour have an impact on the quality of the part? Is the material purchased equivalent whether it is in the form of…
It is the synergy of 2 technologies : Additive manufacturing and powder metallurgy. The term “PIM-like” corresponds to the fact that the printing technology seems to the PIM technology “Powder Injection Molding». In PIM, the shaping phase is made by injection, the shaping is done by printing for the PIM like technology. The raw material…
By simple request by answering our online questionnaire, https://www.peps-interreg.eu/en/, you will be able to receive the entire roadmap drawn up within the framework of the project. For companies wishing to: – Innovate – Stand out, – Maintain their competitiveness, – Compare the many advantages that additive manufacturing could bring them in their business and…
As part of the PEPS project, we attended the annual powder metallurgy congress (EPMA 2020) of the 5th, 6th and 7th of octobre and it was a virtual congress. In this congress different topics were discussed, in particular the PIM-Like process and the development of feedstocks (Metal powder + Polymer binder). Indeed, the development of…
Within the framework of the PEPS project, we wanted to compare different additive manufacturing technologies known as “PIM like” available on the market to print metal turbines. The technologies chosen for this comparative study are the SLM technology (Powder Bed with Laser Beam), the Binder Jetting technology (Powder Bed with polyme’s droplets), the FFF technology…
